Commander Glossary
Commander maintains its own banned list, separate from every other Magic format — because a card that's fine in a two-player, 60-card format can be a very different problem in a four-player, 100-card singleton one. Here's how it works, not a snapshot of exactly what's on it today.
Every constructed Magic format maintains its own banned list, and Commander is no exception — but Commander's is shaped by things unique to the format: multiplayer pods instead of 1v1, a 100-card singleton deck instead of a 60-card deck with up to four copies of anything, a command zone, and color identity restricting what goes in the deck at all. A card evaluated fine for Legacy or Standard can behave completely differently once it's sitting across from three opponents instead of one, in a much longer, more social game.
Commander bans were historically overseen by the Commander Rules Committee, an independent volunteer group that also maintained the format's rules more broadly. That oversight moved to Wizards of the Coast's own R&D team in 2024, bringing Commander ban decisions into the same official process Wizards uses for the format's other rules and for its other constructed formats.
There's no single formula, but a handful of recurring categories show up across Commander's ban history:
Fast, uninteractive wins
Cards that let a single player win (or nearly win) before anyone else gets a meaningful turn — the multiplayer format punishes this far harder than a two-player one, where an opponent at least gets to act first.
Warping the social contract
Effects strong enough that a table has to build around answering one specific card instead of playing their own game plan, or that make the format less fun for everyone at the table when included.
Extra-turn and stax lock effects
Cards that can chain into taking every turn in a game, or that lock down the board so hard other players can't meaningfully act, tend to draw scrutiny specifically because of Commander's multiplayer, longer-game structure.
Legend-rule or format-identity exploits
A handful of bans exist because a card interacts with Commander-specific rules (the command zone, color identity, the legend rule) in a way that breaks the format's basic structure rather than just being powerful.
Deliberately not included here: a list of specific currently-banned cards. Ban lists change, and a page that lists cards by name goes stale the moment the next update happens. For the actual, current list, check Wizards of the Coast's official Commander banned-list page directly rather than any third-party summary — including this one.
Because Commander is structurally different from other formats — multiplayer instead of 1v1, singleton instead of up-to-four-copies, and built around a command zone and color identity that don't exist elsewhere. A card that's perfectly fine in a two-player, 60-card format can be a much bigger problem in a four-player, 100-card singleton one, so Commander evaluates bans independently rather than inheriting another format's list.
Oversight of the Commander banned list moved from the volunteer Commander Rules Committee to Wizards of the Coast's own R&D team in 2024, folding Commander ban decisions into the same official process Wizards uses for its other formats.
Check Wizards of the Coast's official Commander banned list directly rather than relying on any third-party summary (including this one) for the exact current cards — the list changes periodically, and this page is about explaining how and why it works, not tracking every update in real time.
No. Commander's banned list is separate from formats like Legacy or Vintage, and variants such as Duel Commander or cEDH-focused tournament rule sets sometimes run their own additional ban lists on top of the baseline Commander one. Always check which list applies to the specific event or playgroup you're in.
TurnZero tracks the night once decks are locked in — life totals, Commander damage, and every game's results.
Create Free Account