Build Commander
A deck can be full of individually good cards and still feel like nothing in your hand ever connects. That's not a power problem, it's a focus problem, and it has a specific fix.
An unfocused deck isn't a weak deck. It's a deck with no unifying plan: your commander does one thing, your removal is generic, your creatures don't share a theme, and every game you're piecing together a response from whatever happens to be in hand rather than executing something you built on purpose.
This is different from a deck that's simply too low-power for its table, and it's worth telling apart. A low-power deck loses because its cards are individually weak. An unfocused deck can lose with a hand full of strong cards, because none of them are pulling in the same direction, and a synergistic deck at the same power level would have gotten more out of the same number of cards.
You can't describe your deck's plan in one sentence. If the honest answer to "what does this deck do" is a list of unrelated things rather than a single idea, that's the tell.
Your commander's ability doesn't come up much. A commander whose text is mostly irrelevant to how your games actually play out is doing the job of a vanilla creature, not a build-around.
Your removal and card draw are the only consistent thing about the deck. If interaction is the only category that feels intentional and everything else is a grab bag of good stuff, the deck has a support suite and no plan for it to support.
Start from your commander, not from your best cards. Reread your commander's text and ask what it actually wants: more creatures on the battlefield, a specific card type, a resource it cares about. That's your plan, whether or not it's the plan you were building toward before.
Sort your whole deck into "supports the plan" and "doesn't." Be honest about the second pile even when it's full of cards you like. A strong card that doesn't connect to your plan is still a card that isn't pulling its weight.
Cut from the second pile before you cut from the template's core categories. Your ramp, draw, and removal counts (see the deck template) should stay roughly intact. The cuts should come from the cards that are just sitting in the deck being individually fine.
Replace those cuts with cards that reinforce each other. Not necessarily more powerful cards, cards that talk to your plan and to each other. Three cards that support one theme are usually worth more together than three unrelated strong cards, because your draws start compounding instead of just being individually fine.
It's a deck where every card is individually reasonable but there's no throughline connecting them. It doesn't reliably do any one thing well, it does several different things a little, and games with it feel like you're making it up turn to turn rather than executing a plan.
It can be, if those cards don't reinforce each other. A pile of powerful cards that don't share a plan is weaker in practice than a lower-power deck where every card supports the same idea, because the synergistic deck's cards are worth more together than any of them are alone.
If your commander's own ability doesn't connect to the rest of the deck's plan, a rebuild around the commander you already have often isn't enough, since the one card you're guaranteed to draw every game is pulling in a different direction from the other 99. If the commander fits the plan and it's the supporting cast that's scattered, a rebuild around your existing commander is usually the right move.
Sometimes, yes. A card that's individually strong but does nothing for your deck's actual plan is often a worse include than a weaker card that directly supports it. See how to know what cards to cut for the specific test to apply.
Rate My Deck reads your list against the twenty Commander archetypes and tells you what it's actually built to do, free.
Rate My Deck, Free